PROPOSAL FOR RECLAMATION
OF SALINE, ALKALINE AND WATERLOGGED SOILS
INTRODUCTION
The
land is inelastic commodity and the only alternative left to meet
ever-increasing demand of food grains for ever increasing population is to
enhance the productivity of the cultivated land and also to bring potential
degraded lands under plough. The salt affected soils including alkali soils
under such category which have the potential to augment food grain production
and to increase the farm income after reclamation.
According
to the National Commission on Agriculture, an area of 70.00 lakh ha. in the
country suffers from alkalinity and salinity to such an extent that it renders
crop production either impossible or uneconomical .The ‘salt affected soil’
is a general term, which includes soil having excess of soluble salts or
exchangeable sodium or both to an extent that their presence can adversely
affect growth or completely inhibit production of most crops.
The
problem of alkalinity has been aggravated with the development of irrigation
sources especially with the construction of irrigation projects without having
adequate drainage systems and unscientific irrigation management. Application of
excess irrigation water than required by the crop has resulted in increasing
level of alkalinity/salinity in irrigated lands in our country. It is
apprehended that indiscriminate use of canal water is one of the main cause for
further spreading of alkalinity.
In
Karnataka, 100.75 lakh hectare area is under cultivation. Out of this about
23.62 lakh hectares (23%) is under irrigation. Out of this irrigated area about
2.42 lakh hectares has been affected by salinity, alkalinity and waterlogged
conditions and has rendered these lands under-productive or unproductive. In
Karnataka waterlogged condition is the main problem in major command areas which
inturn results in salinity, alkalinity. Depending upon the severity of these
problems, the productivity in affected area is reduced by 25-75 percent. Such
problematic soils are increasing due to poor water management practices
resulting in deterioration of soil structure, texture, aerability and
accumulation of salts clubbed with increase in water table.
In
addition, about 1.47 lakh hectare land is affected by the problem of acidity.
|
Sl.
No. |
Soils |
Area
in Ha. |
|
1. |
Saline |
94600 |
|
2. |
Alkaline |
83960 |
|
3. |
Waterlogged |
63070 |
|
|
Total |
241630
|
The
accumulated salt in the root zone makes soil unsuitable for crops. These salts
can be removed through sub soil drainage by surplus irrigation and drain water.
The salts and minerals get dissolved in water, which carries them towards
drainage system network of perforated corrugated pipes in the form of lateral
and collectors installed at the depth approximately 1 to 1.2 meter and
ultimately flushed to the nala/open drain.
IRS-1C
LISS-III & PAN merged FCC (Salt affected soil)
![]() |
Typical picture of saline and alkaline affected soils
EFFORTS
OF THE STATE
Apart
from Command Area Development Authority (CADA), the Watershed Development
Department is also implementing the programme of reclamation of problematic
soils in the State since 2002-03. About 4057 hectares of land has been treated
upto the end of 2006-07 by the department. The programme has been taken up under
macro mode management of agriculture scheme of GOI. With the meager allocation
of about Rs.100 lakhs annually for the scheme under MMM, it is highly impossible
to take up treatment of about 2.42 lakh hectares of affected land in the State.
Presently, the sub surface tiled drainage system of reclamation is being
followed with the unit cost of Rs. 15000 per hectare. The details of progress
achieved during X Plan period in the State is here under.
|
Sl.No. |
Year |
Phy
(Ha) |
Fin
(Rs) |
|
1. |
2002-03 |
819.79 |
142.94 |
|
2. |
2003-04 |
923.00 |
111.71 |
|
3. |
2004-05 |
593.21 |
71.20 |
|
4. |
2005-06 |
609.00 |
73.15 |
|
5. |
2006-07 |
1112.00 |
133.33 |
|
|
Total |
4057
.00 |
532.33
|
IMPACTS
OF LAND RECLAMATION
Previous
projects of sub surface drainage system revealed substantial percentage of
growth in crop yields by 25% to 75%. Eg. : Soyabeans- 29%,
Peas- 62%, Sugarcane- 42%, Wheat- 76% and Beans- 57%.
The
major problem faced in this programme is the maintenance and inspection of the
work after few years of compleion. Since drains are laid underground, they have
to be maintained by regular cleaning of inspection chambers.
The GOI has recently approved a pilot project for reclamation of
saline, alkaline and waterlogged soils through Subsurface Drainage System with
the project outlay of Rs. 500 lakhs. The project aims at treating 944 hectares
of problematic soils in Ugar Badruk village of Belgaum district of the State.
THE
PROPOSAL
It
is proposed to reclaim about 75000 hectares of problematic soils
in 28 districts of the State during 11th Five Year Plan
period. The total outlay required would be Rs. 300 crores. The details of the
district wise / year wise area to be treated and the outlay required are given
below.
|
Sl.No. |
District |
Total area affected (
Ha.) |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
|||
|
Area (Ha) |
Fin. (lakh Rs) |
Area (Ha) |
Fin. (lakh Rs) |
Area (Ha) |
Fin. (lakh Rs) |
|||
|
1 |
Bangalore |
4920 |
305 |
122.13 |
305 |
122.13 |
305 |
122.13 |
|
2 |
Ramanagara |
1550 |
96 |
38.48 |
96 |
38.48 |
96 |
38.48 |
|
3 |
Kolar |
2704 |
168 |
67.12 |
168 |
67.12 |
168 |
67.12 |
|
4 |
Chikkaballapur |
2460 |
153 |
61.07 |
153 |
61.07 |
153 |
61.07 |
|
5 |
Chitradurga |
13750 |
853 |
341.33 |
853 |
341.33 |
853 |
341.33 |
|
6 |
Davanagere |
14705 |
913 |
365.04 |
913 |
365.04 |
913 |
365.04 |
|
7 |
Tumkur |
7486 |
465 |
185.83 |
465 |
185.83 |
465 |
185.83 |
|
8 |
Madhugiri |
7485 |
465 |
185.81 |
465 |
185.81 |
465 |
185.81 |
|
9 |
Shimoga |
2187 |
136 |
54.29 |
136 |
54.29 |
136 |
54.29 |
|
10 |
Mysore |
8693 |
539 |
215.80 |
539 |
215.80 |
539 |
215.80 |
|
11 |
Mandya |
6132 |
381 |
152.22 |
381 |
152.22 |
381 |
152.22 |
|
12 |
Hassan |
8575 |
532 |
212.87 |
532 |
212.87 |
532 |
212.87 |
|
13 |
Chickmagalur |
4244 |
263 |
105.35 |
263 |
105.35 |
263 |
105.35 |
|
14 |
Udupi |
1550 |
96 |
38.48 |
96 |
38.48 |
96 |
38.48 |
|
15 |
DakshinaKannada |
6044 |
375 |
150.04 |
375 |
150.04 |
375 |
150.04 |
|
16 |
Chamarajanagar |
3150 |
195 |
78.20 |
195 |
78.20 |
195 |
78.20 |
|
17 |
Belgaum |
9476 |
588 |
235.23 |
588 |
235.23 |
588 |
235.23 |
|
18 |
Bijapur |
6240 |
387 |
154.90 |
387 |
154.90 |
387 |
154.90 |
|
19 |
Bagalakote |
20474 |
1271 |
508.25 |
1271 |
508.25 |
1271 |
508.25 |
|
20 |
Gadag |
7540 |
468 |
187.17 |
468 |
187.17 |
468 |
187.17 |
|
21 |
Haveri |
1540 |
96 |
38.23 |
96 |
38.23 |
96 |
38.23 |
|
22 |
Dharwad |
6354 |
394 |
157.73 |
394 |
157.73 |
394 |
157.73 |
|
23 |
Uttara Kannada |
11765 |
730 |
292.06 |
730 |
292.06 |
730 |
292.06 |
|
24 |
Gulbarga |
12526 |
777 |
310.95 |
777 |
310.95 |
777 |
310.95 |
|
25 |
Raichur |
25149 |
1561 |
624.30 |
1561 |
624.30 |
1561 |
624.30 |
|
26 |
Koppal |
11785 |
731 |
292.55 |
731 |
292.55 |
731 |
292.55 |
|
27 |
Bellary |
24718 |
1534 |
613.60 |
1534 |
613.60 |
1534 |
613.60 |
|
28 |
Bidar |
8558 |
531 |
212.45 |
531 |
212.45 |
531 |
212.45 |
|
|
Total |
241760 |
15004 |
6001.49 |
15004 |
6001.49 |
15004 |
6001.49 |
District
wise and year wise programme (contd.)
|
Sl.No. |
District |
20010-11 |
2011-12 |
Total |
|||
|
Area (Ha) |
Fin. (lakh Rs) |
Area (Ha) |
Fin. (lakh Rs) |
Area (Ha) |
Fin. (lakh
Rs) |
||
|
1 |
Bangalore |
305 |
122.13 |
305 |
122.13 |
1526.7 |
610.67 |
|
2 |
Ramanagara |
96 |
38.48 |
96 |
38.48 |
481.0 |
192.39 |
|
3 |
Kolar |
168 |
67.12 |
168 |
67.12 |
839.1 |
335.62 |
|
4 |
Chikkaballapur |
153 |
61.07 |
153 |
61.07 |
763.3 |
305.34 |
|
5 |
Chitradurga |
853 |
341.33 |
853 |
341.33 |
4266.7 |
1706.66 |
|
6 |
Davanagere |
913 |
365.04 |
913 |
365.04 |
4563.0 |
1825.20 |
|
7 |
Tumkur |
465 |
185.83 |
465 |
185.83 |
2322.9 |
929.17 |
|
8 |
Madhugiri |
465 |
185.81 |
465 |
185.81 |
2322.6 |
929.04 |
|
9 |
Shimoga |
136 |
54.29 |
136 |
54.29 |
678.6 |
271.45 |
|
10 |
Mysore |
539 |
215.80 |
539 |
215.80 |
2697.5 |
1078.98 |
|
11 |
Mandya |
381 |
152.22 |
381 |
152.22 |
1902.8 |
761.11 |
|
12 |
Hassan |
532 |
212.87 |
532 |
212.87 |
2660.8 |
1064.34 |
|
13 |
Chickmagalur |
263 |
105.35 |
263 |
105.35 |
1316.9 |
526.77 |
|
14 |
Udupi |
96 |
38.48 |
96 |
38.48 |
481.0 |
192.39 |
|
15 |
DakshinaKannada |
375 |
150.04 |
375 |
150.04 |
1875.5 |
750.19 |
|
16 |
Chamarajanagar |
195 |
78.20 |
195 |
78.20 |
977.5 |
390.98 |
|
17 |
Belgaum |
588 |
235.23 |
588 |
235.23 |
2940.4 |
1176.17 |
|
18 |
Bijapur |
387 |
154.90 |
387 |
154.90 |
1936.3 |
774.51 |
|
19 |
Bagalakote |
1271 |
508.25 |
1271 |
508.25 |
6353.1 |
2541.25 |
|
20 |
Gadag |
468 |
187.17 |
468 |
187.17 |
2339.7 |
935.87 |
|
21 |
Haveri |
96 |
38.23 |
96 |
38.23 |
477.9 |
191.15 |
|
22 |
Dharwad |
394 |
157.73 |
394 |
157.73 |
1971.7 |
788.66 |
|
23 |
Uttara Kannada |
730 |
292.06 |
730 |
292.06 |
3650.7 |
1460.28 |
|
24 |
Gulbarga |
777 |
310.95 |
777 |
310.95 |
3886.8 |
1554.74 |
|
25 |
Raichur |
1561 |
624.30 |
1561 |
624.30 |
7803.8 |
3121.51 |
|
26 |
Koppal |
731 |
292.55 |
731 |
292.55 |
3656.9 |
1462.76 |
|
27 |
Bellary |
1534 |
613.60 |
1534 |
613.60 |
7670.0 |
3068.02 |
|
28 |
Bidar |
531 |
212.45 |
531 |
212.45 |
2655.6 |
1062.23 |
|
|
Total |
15004 |
6001.49 |
15004 |
6001.49 |
75018.6 |
30007.45 |
UNIT
COST
As
the perforated clay pipes that are being used for sub surface drainage are
easily breakable and are short lived in nature, it is proposed to take up lining
of perforated PVC pipes with the increased unit cost of Rs.40000 per hectare.
Unit
cost of sub surface drainage system for land reclamation
|
Sl.No |
SSR Code |
Description of work |
Qty |
Rate (Rs) |
Unit |
Amt |
|
1 |
1.1C |
Survey, leveling & preparation
of contour maps @ 8.38 m grids |
1
ha |
155 |
1
ha |
155 |
|
2 |
|
Field visit, Soil Test,
Projectization |
1ha |
200 |
1
ha |
200 |
|
3 |
|
Trainings |
1
ha |
100 |
1
ha |
100 |
|
4 |
11.1 |
Excavation for main drain |
40.162 |
42 |
Cum |
1686.80 |
|
5 |
11.1 |
For Lateral drains |
91.125 |
42 |
Cmt |
3827.25 |
|
6 |
|
Laying 4”PVC Pipe |
85 |
110 |
Rmt |
9350 |
|
7 |
|
Laying 2”PVC perforated Pipe |
225 |
85 |
Rmt |
19125 |
|
8 |
11.4 |
Laying 2m,15 cm dia PCC Concrete
pipe for outlet |
1 |
330 |
M |
330 |
|
9 |
|
Providing & fixing T joints of
5& 10 cm and join main & laterals |
6 |
60 |
No |
360 |
|
10 |
11.6 |
Construction.of Stone masonry
protection wall |
1 |
550 |
No |
550 |
|
11 |
11.7 |
Construction of Drop Chamber using
size stones |
1
Cha |
1650 |
No |
1650 |
|
12 |
|
Construction of inspection chambers
in brick masonry at every lateral joints |
5 |
525 |
No |
2625 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
39959.05 |
|
|
|
Rounded |
|
|
|
40000.00 |
METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION
a)
Technology models involved
Horizontal Subsurface Drainage System for reclamation of Saline, Alkaline
and Waterlogged soils will be constructed. This involves laying of perforated
PVC pipes horizontally in the subsurface. The project will be implemented
through the technical persons having sufficient experience in the field.
b)
Ownership of lands
Private lands belonging to individuals will be considered for the
project.
c)
Training
Both the Departmental staff and the beneficiaries will be imparted
training on the guidelines and technical issues in implementation of the
project.
d)
Monitoring and Evaluation
Necessary steps will be taken to identify the benchmarks for quantifying the deliverable output/desired results for various parameters viz. fertility status, moisture status, productivity/biomass yield, employment generation etc., at pre project and post project periods.


FUNDING
PATTERN
|
Sl.No. |
Particular |
GOI
Share
(Rs. Lakhs) |
GOK
Share
(Rs. Lakhs) |
Total
(Rs. Lakhs) |
|
1. |
Reclamation of saline, alkaline and
waterlogged soils by subsurface drainage system |
27000.00 |
3000.00 |
30000.00 |
JUSTFICATION
The protection and improvement of soil health
is one of the ‘PANCHASUTRA’s adopted in formulating the Karnataka
Agriculture Policy 2006, which envisages the importance of reclamation of
problematic soils in the State. Because of the poor land management practices
especially in the command areas, the land has become barren which adversely
affect the crop production.
Improving
the health of the degraded lands and bringing them under cultivation is one of
the alternatives available for improving the agriculture production in the
country to feed the ever growing population. Hence there is an urgent need to
reclaim problematic soils of the State to harvest the potential of the available
land resources.
IMPLEMENTATION
SCHEDULE
The above mentioned programme will be
implemented in a phased manner over a period of five years. The same is laso
included in the District Plan prepared for XI Five Year Plan. The Panchayt Raj
Institutions were also involved in identifying the problematic soils.
COST
BENEFITS
|
Sl. No |
Crop |
Present |
Expected |
||
|
Yield
(Q/Ha) |
Income
(Rs.) |
Yield
(Q/Ha) |
Income
(Rs.) |
||
|
1. |
Paddy |
15-20 |
10500-14000 |
35-40 |
24500-28000 |
|
2. |
Sugarcane |
35-40t/ha |
38500-44000 |
100-150 |
110000-150000 |
|
3. |
Groundnut |
3.5-4.0 |
7000-8000 |
7.5-8.5 |
15000-17000 |
|
4. |
Jowar |
10-12 |
10000-12000 |
15-20 |
15000-20000 |
SOCIO
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
By
reclaiming the problematic soils in a phased manner in different regions in the
State will lead to many direct and indirect socio economic benefits for the
ultimate benefit of the farming community and agricultural labourers. The brief
socio economic benefits can be listed as below:-
·
Reclamation
of lands affected by salinity,
alkalinity and waterlogging and improvement of land productivity.
·
Increase
in the crop productivity and horticultural production in the reclaimed area.
·
Increase
in the production of fuel wood and fodder.
·
Generation
of employment opportunities in the rural area and thereby reducing the
rural-urban migration.
ABSTRACT SUMMARY
The
State needs Rs.300 crores for treatment of 75000 hectares of saline, alkaline
and waterlogged soils over a period of five years during XI Five Year Plan
period.